Yes, web3 can be hard for new users to use. Key pain points include a lack of user-friendly interfaces, the complexity of smart contracts, and the need for users to understand the underlying technology. AI has exploded in popularity due to its relative ease of use, with developers creating user-friendly interfaces and powerful automation tools. Blockchain developers can learn from this by creating user-friendly interfaces that are intuitive and easy to use, as well as providing tools that automate the process of creating and deploying smart contracts. By making web3 more accessible, developers can help to increase its adoption and make it easier for new users to get started.

Business Development

Came across a recent article that AI exploded in popularity because how simple it is to use.

https://fortune.com/crypto/2023/06/09/a-i-exploded-in-popularity-because-its-so-easy-to-use-heres-what-blockchain-developers-can-learn-from-that/

Founder

#onboarding

#blockchain

#web3

Both Ethereum and Polygon (formerly known as Matic Network) are popular blockchain protocols used for writing smart contracts. The choice between Ethereum and Polygon depends on several factors, including project requirements, scalability needs, transaction costs, and network characteristics. Let's explore the characteristics of each protocol:

Ethereum: Ethereum is the leading blockchain platform for decentralized applications (DApps) and smart contracts. It has a robust ecosystem, widespread adoption, and strong community support. Ethereum's mainnet offers high security and decentralization, making it suitable for applications that require the highest level of trust and security. However, Ethereum's scalability is a known challenge, resulting in high transaction costs and potential network congestion during periods of high activity.

Polygon: Polygon is a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum that aims to address Ethereum's scalability limitations. It provides a framework for building and connecting multiple sidechains, offering faster and cheaper transactions while maintaining compatibility with Ethereum's mainnet. Polygon offers a more scalable and cost-effective alternative to Ethereum, making it suitable for applications that require high transaction throughput and lower costs. Additionally, Polygon provides a growing ecosystem of tools and services, along with a vibrant developer community.

Considering these factors, if your project requires the highest level of security, decentralization, and the ability to interact directly with Ethereum's mainnet, Ethereum would be the preferred choice. Ethereum is well-suited for applications that need to leverage the entire Ethereum ecosystem and its extensive network effects.

On the other hand, if scalability, lower transaction costs, and faster transaction confirmation times are critical for your project, and you can sacrifice some degree of decentralization by using a Layer 2 solution, Polygon becomes an attractive option. Polygon can provide a more cost-efficient and scalable environment for developing and deploying smart contracts, especially for applications that prioritize high transaction throughput and lower fees.

Blockchain Engineer

Ethereum is still the preferred protocol for projects to write smart contracts for, due to its high security, scalability, and large user base. However, other L2 chains like Polygon are becoming increasingly popular, as they offer faster transaction speeds and lower gas fees. Polygon is especially attractive for projects that require high throughput, such as gaming and DeFi applications. Ultimately, it depends on the project's specific needs and which protocol offers the best features to meet those needs.

Or are other L2 chains more interesting to users today?

#polygon

#ethereum

yeah, don't think would have had the opportunity to work with people all across if were limited by geography, city, etc.

I am Romil, building Outdefine a tokenized talent community for global tech talent to network and get jobs. Join us and own your career!


I greatly value the opportunity to work remotely. This arrangement provides me with the flexibility I need to balance my work responsibilities effectively while also allowing me to spend quality time with my family. Being able to work from a location of my choice enables me to optimize my productivity and maintain a healthy work-life balance.

Global Technical Recruiter

I am also firm on remaining remote. I also don't think that the old standard for in-office work culture will ever fully return. I think it's now shown that businesses can remain successful with remote teams. For many companies, remote work also removes some added expenses. 

Marketing manager

Yes, I have a similar experience. I discussed my preference to remain remote with my employer and explained the benefits to both myself and the company. I highlighted the advantages of remote work such as increased productivity, reduced overhead costs, and improved work-life balance. I also shared how I could continue to collaborate with colleagues and meet deadlines with the same level of commitment. Ultimately, my employer agreed to let me continue to work remotely.

Recently, the CEO of Open AI saying that remote was just an experiment, and we need to return to office. However, I am firm on remaining remote. Does anyone have a similar experience, and how did you bring it up to your employer?

Romil Verma

Careers

CEO

Software Engineer

Education

Stanford University

Purdue University

Welcome to Outdefine

Boards

Similar profiles

Welcome to Outdefine

Join a community, when you join Outdefine!Connect with 72,000 tech professionals globally.